agentvictoriahand:

spooky-neighborhood-demiurge:

qozxe:

my-kokoro-just-brokoro:

This isn’t like Ash and Pikachu. How the fuck does he expect to catch him?

rest in fucking pieces

nO YOU FUCKING BASTARDS THIS IS HIS STARTER. HIS. STARTER. YOU DON’T THINK YOU DON’T RATIONALIZE YOU DON’T THINK OF YOURSELF IF THE STARTER IS HURT AND YOU CAN IN ANY WAY CUSHION THEIR FALL YOU CUSHION THE DAMN FALL

starter bond is somethin special all right doesnt matter how much that charizard weighs you lift it up

probablyfreeformrpgideas:

perringwrites:

maramahan:

So the other day, I was thinking about the classic alignment chart, and how it doesn’t really do much for me personally since it’s more about how characters interact with systems rather than how they interact with other people

I had a minute, so I figured I’d throw something together that DID suit my needs!

(Note: This chart regards a character’s intent rather than the outcome of their actions—and for sake of clarity, here are the definitions I’m working with:

Good: concerned with the well-being the collective, often at expense of the self

Evil: concerned with the well-being of the self, often at the expense of the collective

Kind: concerned with the emotional responses of others

Cruel: unconcerned with the emotional responses of others)

I like conceptualizing things this way, cause sometimes Bad People behave with ‘good’ or ‘kind’ intentions, and sometimes Good People do things that seem ‘evil’ or ‘cruel’

Also this gives me a way to compare/contrast characters who get lumped together under the other system

Ohoho. This is gonna change things.

I really like this!!